| Party Name |
Ratio |
| The State of Bihar Vs. Chandra Bhushan Singh & Ors., AIR 2001 SC 429 |
Cr.P.C. S.2(d) - Charge sheet by RPF officer for offence under Railway Property Act can be treated as complaint of the RPF. |
| Attiq-Ur-Rehman Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi, AIR 1996 SC 1267 |
Cr.P.C. S.4 - In absence of special court, the regular court can try the offence. |
| Thomas Dana Vs. The State of Punjab, AIR 1959 SC 375 |
Cr.P.C. S.4 - The words "Punishment" and "Penalty" are explained. |
| Republic of Italy thr. Ambassador & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors., 2013(1) SCALE 462 |
Cr.P.C. S.4 - Union Govt was directed to constitute special court. |
| Pankajbhai Nagjibhai Patel Vs. The State of Gujarat & Anr., AIR 2001 SC 567 |
Cr.P.C. S.4(2) - When the special statute does not prescribe procedure, Cr.P.C. is applicable. |
| In Re: Sikandarkhan Mahomedkhan, 1920(22) BOMLR 200 |
Cr.P.C. S.9 - Additional Sessions Judge can hear appeal. |
| Emperor Vs. Lakshman Chavji Narangikar, AIR 1931 Bom 313 |
Cr.P.C. S.9(3) - Assistant and Additional Sessions Judges exercise jurisdiction of Sessions Court but they are separate Courts. |
| Praphakar Vs. The State of Maharashtra, 2012 Cri.L.J. 4726 |
Cr.P.C. S.28 - Assistant Sessions Judge should not be allotted with case punishable with more than 10 years. |
| Pankajbhai Nagjibhai Patel Vs. The State of Gujarat, AIR 2001 SC 567 |
Cr.P.C. S.29 & S.138 NI Act - Magistrate has no pecuniary limit for compensation. |
| Shidlingappa Gurulingappa Vs. Emperor, AIR 1926 Bom 416 |
Cr.P.C. S.31 - Aggregate fine should be considered for the purpose of appeal. |
| Chatar Singh Vs. State Of M.P., AIR 2007 SC 319 |
Cr.P.C. S.31 - Aggregate sentence not to exceed 14 years when consecutive SC says. |